Beautiful Ursula Haverbeck, your life work here on earth is now done. You can rejoin with those beautiful and strong German heroes who have gone before. Your spirit, your work, your compassion, your gigantic contribution in correcting the falsified history, have moved us inexorably closer toward ultimate victory! Your spirit will continue to live on in our hearts and minds. You upheld all that is beautiful, true and good. We will remember you.
Thank you!
At 96 years of age, Ursula has taken her last breath in the physical realm. She was an exceptional human being who was not only gifted with incredible intelligence and clarity, but also with compassion and great courage. She never compromised on speaking truth, staying true to her principles and facing her/our adversaries squarely and without fear.
What did Ursula Haverbeck do? She spent five years asking questions – she wrote to various levels of governments, to Jewish groups, to agencies, etc., asking them the simple question,
“Where did the alleged murder of 6 million Jews take place?”
None ever answered her question. Finally she went public with her conclusions. She concluded that nobody answered the question because there was no answer. There was no answer because there was no place. If there was no place where the crime happened, then the crime did not happen.
This is the video in which she addresses the German people, entitled “The Greatest Problem of our Time”, 20 minutes: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rd3LM7WusYkl
Here is an article telling more detail about Ursula’s life, including the trials and tribulations of being persecuted and jailed for having the courage to fight for historical truth: https://www.heritageanddestiny.com/ursula-haverbeck-1928-2024-warrior-for-truth/
Also please see previous articles about Ursula Haverbeck on this website, such as this one from October 2022: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-ordered-back-to-prison-and-her-rebuttal-to-this-order/ and this one from 7 December 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-update-on-the-verdict/ and this one from 3 December 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-faces-the-inquisition-again/ and from 5 November 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-is-free/
It is noteworthy that the criminals in charge of the occupied state known as the Federal Republic of Germany were seeking to imprison Ursula right up to the moment of her death. They were trying to find a prison or even a prison hospital which could accommodate a 96-year old woman.
These beautiful words from Joe Fallisi in Italy:
“Ursula Haverbeck (Robert Faurisson International Prize 2019, first edition) has ascended to Valhalla to reunite with Ernst Zündel and so many other National Socialist heroes who were her comrades. A woman as beautiful on the outside as she was on the inside, intelligent, with integrity, adamantine, throughout her long life, so well spent, she fought for the honour of Germany and historical truth and justice. The miserable traitors in the pay and service of Shylock, who have occupied the whole of Europe since 1945, tried to defeat her courage, her probity. Impossible. The diamond remains as it is and shines forever.”
15 Responses
Something else about the patriotic milieu in the Federal Republic of Germany, which becomes apparent when you have dealings with it. Activists from this camp, who had organized rallies and influenced opinion, later disappeared again. Even though they were always much closer to you than the completely dependent people who were in tune with the spirit of the times, they still seemed wavering and not very independent. A few years later, the unreliability and contradictions that led to confusion became apparent. Some had become self-employed as journalists and teachers – they wrote articles for the neo-conservative milieu, distancing themselves from their previous nationalist work and offering opinion-forming courses on ideology and networking – they were looking for contacts. A completely unnecessary, opaque business model, because normal people will hardly spend time and money on such nonsense. Nevertheless, the converted nationalists seemed to be able to live off of it – they must have received money from some foundations and offices against right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism, racism, etc. It is almost certain that they had contacts there before – they were very probably already on assignment at that time, otherwise the Federal Republic of Germany would have such people persecuted and ensure that they do not receive any orders, even as tradesmen. Other reformed right-wingers took things even more colorfully – they worked as refugee helpers. In the Federal Republic of Germany, this milieu consists of three groups in particular: the first feels comfortable in its role as a national outsider, the second tries to make money from it, the third is commissioned by secret services. None of them are really interested in white people getting ahead – they don’t even use the word “white people” – you can’t get anywhere with them.
Ich stimme diesen Beobachtungen zu. Da wirft sicherlich Folgendes ein Schlaglicht auf die Vorgänge in unserem Lande. 2023 mußte die Bundesregierung zugeben, daß sie seit 2018 insgesamt fast 1,5 Millionen Euro an Journalisten gezahlt habe. Danach wurde die Regierung durch das Parlament nicht mehr zu Journalistenhonoraren befragt. So wissen wir nichts über wahrscheinlich fortlaufende Zahlungen. Besonders begünstigt wurden die Staatsmedien, die bei uns “öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk” genannt werden oder auch “Qualitätsmedien”. Allerdings wurde verheimlicht, was der Bundesnachrichtendienst BND (Geheimdienst) an weiteren Honoraren an Journalisten zahlte. Das Staatswohl stand höher als das Interesse der Bürger zu erfahren, wieviel gekaufte Berichterstattung es tatsächlich gibt. Das nennt sich hier selbst “die freie” Presse. Nicht eingeschlossen sind weitere Geldquellen. So hat Udo Ulfkotte in “Gekaufte Journalisten” 2014 preisgeben, wie viel er und andere von der CIA, der Atlantik-Brücke, der Trilateralen Kommission und dem Marshall Fund an Geld erhalten und wie sie beeinflußt werden. Ulfkottes Aussagen wurden sogleich öffentlich rechtlich angezweifelt und er wurde Rechtspopulist, Verschwörungstheoretiker und Islamkritiker genannt. Morddrohungen brachten ihn in ein geheimes Schutzprogramm. Mit nicht einmal 57 Jahren verstarb er plötzlich. Kartelle aus wenigen Großverlagen, auch der Sozialdemokratie, die Lizensierung von deutschen Pressehäusern wie die Verlage Springer (lange Jahre Medienmonopolist) und Bertelsmann (weltweit größter Medienkonzern) nach dem Krieg durch die Alliierten sind dabei nicht angesprochen. Auch nicht die enge Freundschaft und Vertrautheit, die Ex-Bundeskanzlerin Merkel mit Friede Springer und Liz Mohn von diesen Häusern pflegte. Ein höchst bedenkliches Netzwerk aus Macht und Einfluß. Der Geheimdienst (BND) überwacht, besticht und bespitzelt auch Journalisten (Schäfer-Bericht 2006), ebenso wie der Verfassungsschutz (Inlandsgeheimdienst). Beide nutzen Journalisten auch als Quellen. Wir sprechen auch nicht von der Massenüberwachung durch den Geheimdienst BND und Verfassungsschutz. Ist Journalismus hier noch frei oder schon rein staatliche Auftragsarbeit?
I think from now on I will put the “deepl” translation into these comments, Hilken, because they are very important, and most of my readers are english-speaking.
from Hilken:
I agree with these observations. The following certainly sheds light on what is happening in our country. In 2023, the federal government had to admit that it had paid a total of almost 1.5 million euros to journalists since 2018. After that, the government was no longer questioned by parliament about journalists’ fees. As a result, we know nothing about payments that are likely to be ongoing. The state media, which we refer to as ‘public service broadcasting’ or ‘quality media’, were particularly favoured. However, the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) kept secret the additional fees it paid to journalists. The public interest took precedence over the public’s right to know how much paid-for reporting actually exists. This is what is referred to here as “the free” press. Other sources of funding are not included. In his 2014 book *Gekaufte Journalisten* (Bought Journalists), Udo Ulfkotte revealed how much he and others receive in funding from the CIA, the Atlantik-Brücke, the Trilateral Commission and the Marshall Fund, and how they are influenced. Ulfkotte’s statements were immediately publicly questioned in legal terms, and he was labelled a right-wing populist, a conspiracy theorist and a critic of Islam. Death threats led to him being placed in a secret protection programme. He died suddenly, not even 57 years old. The cartels formed by a handful of major publishing houses, including those linked to the Social Democrats, and the licensing of German media houses such as the Springer publishing group (a media monopolist for many years) and Bertelsmann (the world’s largest media group) by the Allies after the war are not mentioned here. Nor is there any mention of the close friendship and intimacy that former Chancellor Merkel maintained with Friede Springer and Liz Mohn from these publishing houses. A highly worrying network of power and influence. The intelligence service (BND) monitors, bribes and spies on journalists (Schäfer Report 2006), as does the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (domestic intelligence service). Both also use journalists as sources. Nor do we speak of the mass surveillance carried out by the BND and the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Is journalism here still free, or is it already purely state-commissioned work?
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Dear Monika, Mrs Haverbeck as well as you and Alfred have done something unusual – they have gone against the spirit of the times. Not many people manage that. We from the GDR see things more soberly. The activists who investigated the events surrounding the Holocaust and disseminated what they discovered did a lot. However, it is questionable whether the discovered contradictions are the “biggest problem of our time”. Even though the Holocaust primarily threatens the Germans and is used to enslave all whites, the bigger problem is slavery itself, because free people are not easily frightened. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter what keeps them unfree – if the Holocaust disappears, the magicians will pull something new out of their sleeves. If the whites want to regain control over themselves, true and liberal thinking must reach as many of them as possible. The mixing of such thinking with National Socialist thinking, as suggested by Fallisi, perhaps even the equating of freedom with an ideology – in this case National Socialism – is misleading, scares many people away and keeps them under the control of the Jews. Ursula and Werner Haverbeck are said to have trained young people in pedagogy, nature and NS-ideology in their Collegium Humanum. The fact that both were obviously close to National Socialism may have something to do with their positive experiences in the Third Reich, but critics were also discriminated against in the Third Reich and were denied work and training – this is exactly what happened to the National Socialists until 1933 and today many Germans in the Federal Republic of Germany are experiencing this. Education, work and life itself should be largely free of patronizing ideology – that is the realization of critically thinking GDR people. That is why we can hardly understand why Mrs. Haverbeck never got to this point. Her always good contacts with Horst Mahler – an old communist – and Henry Hafenmayer, who on his website disparaged less National Socialist-minded but solid Germans, were somewhat surprising. It should also be mentioned that this milieu is permeated by secret services and receives money.
Thank you for the interesting comment.
Just a brief response on a couple of points: I agree with Ursula Haverbeck about “The Holocaust” being the biggest problem of our time, or, articulated slightly differently, the lynchpin lie of our times. Reason being, to expose this lie is to expose the identity of the enemy of humanity, and that is organized Jewry. Second point is about National Socialism, if I could distill it to its simplest form, perhaps it could also be called Natural Law.
One more point, I will defend Henry Hafenmayer as a great man who did more than 99.99999% of our people for our people, had courage, integrity, intelligence and humility. He is no longer with us and so is unable to defend himself. We are much poorer by his absence, however we were so very enriched by his presence. His spirit and the spirit of Ursula Haverbeck will live on with us.
Thomas spricht von der Einschränkung der Freiheit. Ich denke, ich gebe eine wichtige Hintergrundinformation. Ich hoffe, das ist in Ordnung. Es geht um die Durchdringung unserer Gesellschaft mit dem Gedankengut der Psychoanalyse. Dieser Begriff wurde nicht von S. Freud, sondern von J. Breuer erfunden. Sigismund Schlomoh Freud entstammte der dritten Ehe seines Vaters, der sich vorher wiederholt hatte scheiden lassen. Seine um 20 Jahre jüngere Ehefrau vergötterte ihren goldigen Sigi. Er verliebte sich nach eigenem Bekenntnis in seine Mutter bei gleichzeitiger heftiger Eifersucht auf den Vater. Sigismund Freud lebte als Kind im Ghetto in Wien, entfremdet vom jüdischen Glauben wurde er Atheist. In der deutschen Version seines Namens, als Sigmund Freud, verlegte er den philosophischen Grundsatz, ich denke, also bin ich, in den Unterleib. Er erfand den Ödipus-Komplex. Und nun wird es pervers. Der unterstellt nämlich sexuelles Verlangen und einen Vereinigungswunsch des Sohnes zur eigenen Mutter. Gewissermaßen verdrehte S. Freud den Logos in den blinden Trieb und schuf den Primat von Sexus über Agape, von Dyonisus über Apoll. Sigmund Freud interessierte sich für das Irrationale, womit er abendländische Denktraditionen verneinte und subversiv unterbrach. Freud entwickelte eine sekulare Religion enthemmter Lust und stellte sich auf die Seite von Darwin und Marx. Darwin widersprach der Schöpfung als Ursache des Lebens. Marx widersprach dem Christentum als Ursache von Familie und Gesellschaft. Freuds Idol wurde der enthemmte Phallus. Seine eigenen inzestuösen Fantasien unterlegte er uns allen, seinem christlichen Umfeld und machte aus unserer lebendigen schöpferbegabten Seele eine Art technischen psychischen Apparat. Er bestimmte auch das Unbewußte zum Dämon über das Bewußtsein und untersuchte alternative Geisteszustände wie Hypnose und Traum. Als Kokainsüchtiger war ihm das sicherlich ganz vertraut, in einem alternativen Geisteszustand zu verweilen. Damit bereitete Freud eine Ideologie sexueller Enthemmung und eines Sittenverfalls vor. Freud log über seine vermeintlichen Erfolge und fälschte Behandlungsergebnisse zu seinen Gunsten und strickte mit unlauteren Mitteln an seinem Ruhm. Sein Neffe Edvard Barnay (Spezialist für Werbung) vermarktete ihn in den USA und machte Freud berühmt. Freud nahm extrem hohe Honorare, denn er mußte bei seinem großbürgerlichen Lebensstil auch Dienstboten bezahlen. Seine jüngste Tochter Anna quälte er als Jugendliche durch eine fünf- bis sechstägige Psychoanalyse über Jahre. Sie wurde – von ihrem Vater durchanalysiert – Kinderanalytikerin. Später lebte Anna mit einer Frau und ihren vier Kindern zusammen, von denen sich zwei das Leben nahmen und einer an einer Alkoholvergiftung starb. Alle vier Kinder hatten ihr Leben lang Drogenprobleme. Freuds Enkel Sir Clement Freud wurde später als Pädophiler öffentlich bekannt. Kann man also bei der Familie Freud von einer dysfunktionalen Familie sprechen mit Hinweisen auf allerlei sexuelle Perversionen? Karl Jaspers warf Sigmund Freud vor, das geistige Leben zu degradieren und die Niederungen zu verabsolutieren. Freud reduzierte den Menschen auf ein Triebwesen und errichtete ein unbeweisbares pseudoreligiöses Dogma. In meiner eigenen Praxis fand ich, daß die Psychoanalyse zu einer Fehlhaltung führt, einer Art Nabelschau und dem Reflex, alle eigenen Leiden den Eltern anzulasten. Diese Fehlhaltung wird regelmäßig erzeugt und kostet uns viel Geld, denn eine Analyse wird in Deutschland viele Jahre mit mehreren Sitzungen in der Woche von der Krankenversicherung bezahlt.
A very interesting comment, thank you Hilke! The true story about Sigmund Freud.
Be carefull whom you follow. Do not believe everything. Liebe Monika, hier noch etwas über jüdische Genies wie Sigmund Freud.
Karl Marx Vater (Hirsch Mordechai Marx) war Sohn des Rabbiners Morchai Marx Levy. Geboren wurde der Vater von Karl als Heschel/Hirschel Levi. Er trat zum Protestantismus über, um weniger Hindernisse in seiner Laufbahn zu haben. Dieser Protestantismus hat auf seinen Sohn nicht abgefärbt, denn dieser war radikaler Atheist. Mütterlicherseits entstammte Karl Marx einer Jahrhunderte alten Linie von Rabbis. Karl Marx war so besessen von seiner Arbeit als Privatgelehrter, daß er dem Familienleben keine Beachtung schenkte. Viel Feind, viel Ehr. Marx haßte jeden, legte sich auch mit dem von ihm verachteten Arbeiterführer Lasalle heftig an, pumpte ihn aber auch immer wieder an. Engels hielt nach Hunderten von Bettelbriefen Marx finanziell aus, teils geriet er dadurch selbst in Not. Selbst eine nicht unbedeutende Erbschaft verschwendete Marx binnen kurzem. Marx bemühte sich nie um ein Erwerbseinkommen und zahlte seine Schulden nie zurück. Immer gerne zechend und Theater besuchend, lebte er nicht schlecht. Seine Ehefrau, die adlige und schöne Jenny von Westphalen mit ihrer ansehnlichen Mitgift mußte dadurch mit den Kindern extreme Armut und Zwangsräumungen durchleiden. Dennoch liebte sie ihren Karl, führte seine Korrespondenz und unterstützte ihn bei seiner Arbeit. Von den sieben gemeinsamen Kindern verstarben bereit vier im Kindesalter. Die älteste überlebende Tochter starb an Krebs, die jüngeren begangen Selbstmord. Aus einer von mehreren Affairen stammte sein Sohn, den er völlig ignorierte und in bitterster Armut verhungern ließ. Schmarotzerischer Lebensstil ist eine antisemitische Behauptung. Seilschaften auch. Immerhin hat Karl Marx ja für die Ewigkeit geschrieben. Den großbürgerlichen Lebensstil dieses Mannes können wir nicht proletarisch nennen, den seiner Familienmitglieder schon. Lebten sie doch im Bettelproletariat. Marx hatte nichts von Güte,Herz, Menschlichkeit, er war ein kalter Soziopath. Engels opferte sich für den Freund auf und verzichtete auf sein eigenes Werk. Marx, Einstein und Freud sind der ganze Stolz heutiger Juden. Bei Freud habe ich die dysfunktionale Familie schon herausgearbeitet. Bei Marx ist das jetzt auch getan. Fehlt nur noch Einstein:
Albert Einstein hatte mit seiner ersten Frau drei Kinder. Seine Ehe scheiterte. Dann heiratete er seine Kusine. Neben seinen Ehefrauen hatte er Affairen, darunter auch mit seiner Cousine Elsa. Seine Söhne beschrieben ihn als gefühlskalt. Sein Sohn Eduard wurde schizophren und verstarb in einem psychiatrischen Krankenhaus. Wir haben also auch hier ein dysfunktionales Familienleben. Einstein selbst sah sich als einen Einzelgänger. Er war Kommunist, Zionist, aber strikt gegen den Nationalismus aller anderen Völker, gegen die Weiße Rasse und befürwortete eine Weltregierung. Ihm wurde die Staatspräsidentschaft Israels angetragen – und er wurde von mehreren Wissenschaftlern als Plagiatist angegriffen. Als “Pazifist” schlug er den Amerikanern den Bau der Atombombe gegen Deutschland vor. Ich frage mich, wer seine Werbekampagne für den Nobelpreis und als Popstar der Physik vorbereitet hat, den er 1922 statt des eigentlichen Entdeckers Heinrich Hertz erhielt. Sollte das der Propagandist und doppelte Neffe von Sigmund Freud Edvard Bernay gewesen sein? Richtig!
Translation of Hilke’s comment:
Karl Marx’s father (Hirsch Mordechai Marx) was the son of Rabbi Morchai Marx Levy. Karl’s father was born Heschel/Hirschel Levi. He converted to Protestantism to face fewer obstacles in his career. This Protestantism did not rub off on his son, however, as the latter was a radical atheist. On his mother’s side, Karl Marx came from a centuries-old line of rabbis. Karl Marx was so obsessed with his work as a private scholar that he paid no attention to family life. Many enemies, much honour. Marx hated everyone; he also clashed fiercely with the labour leader Lasalle, whom he despised, yet repeatedly pestered him for money. After hundreds of begging letters, Engels supported Marx financially, though this sometimes left him in need himself. Marx even squandered a not insignificant inheritance within a short time. Marx never sought to earn a living and never paid back his debts. Always keen on drinking and going to the theatre, he lived quite comfortably. His wife, the noble and beautiful Jenny von Westphalen, with her substantial dowry, consequently had to endure extreme poverty and evictions with the children. Nevertheless, she loved her Karl, managed his correspondence and supported him in his work. Of their seven children, four had already died in infancy. The eldest surviving daughter died of cancer; the younger ones committed suicide. His son, the product of one of several affairs, was completely ignored by him and left to starve in abject poverty. The claim that he led a parasitic lifestyle is an anti-Semitic one. So is the suggestion of cliques. After all, Karl Marx did write for posterity. We cannot describe this man’s upper-class lifestyle as proletarian, but we can say that of his family members certainly was. They lived, after all, among the destitute proletariat. Marx had no kindness, compassion or humanity; he was a cold-hearted sociopath. Engels sacrificed himself for his friend and set aside his own work. Marx, Einstein and Freud are the pride and joy of today’s Jews. I have already highlighted Freud’s dysfunctional family. I have now done the same for Marx.
Now regarding Einstein:
Albert Einstein had three children with his first wife. His marriage broke down. He then married his cousin. In addition to his wives, he had affairs, including one with his cousin Elsa. His sons described him as emotionally cold. His son Eduard developed schizophrenia and died in a psychiatric hospital. So here, too, we have a dysfunctional family life. Einstein himself saw himself as a loner. He was a communist, a Zionist, but strictly opposed to the nationalism of all other peoples, against the white race, and advocated a world government. He was offered the presidency of Israel – and was attacked by several scientists as a plagiarist. As a “pacifist”, he suggested to the Americans that they build the atomic bomb against Germany. I wonder who orchestrated his campaign for the Nobel Prize and his status as a pop star of physics, which he received in 1922 instead of the actual discoverer, Heinrich Hertz. Could it have been the propagandist and second cousin of Sigmund Freud, Edward Bernays? Correct!
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Translation of Hilen’s comment:
Thomas speaks of the restriction of freedom. I think I’ll provide some important background information. I hope that’s all right. It concerns the permeation of our society with the ideas of psychoanalysis. This term was not coined by S. Freud, but by J. Breuer. Sigismund Schlomoh Freud was the son of his father’s third marriage; his father had previously been divorced several times. His wife, 20 years his junior, adored her darling Sigi. By his own admission, he fell in love with his mother whilst simultaneously harbouring intense jealousy towards his father. As a child, Sigismund Freud lived in the ghetto in Vienna; alienated from the Jewish faith, he became an atheist. In the German version of his name, Sigmund Freud, he transposed the philosophical principle ‘I think, therefore I am’ to the lower abdomen. He invented the Oedipus complex. And now it gets perverse. For this implies sexual desire and a desire for union on the part of the son towards his own mother.
In a sense, S. Freud twisted the Logos into blind instinct and established the primacy of sex over agape, of Dionysus over Apollo. Sigmund Freud was interested in the irrational, thereby rejecting and subversively disrupting Western traditions of thought. Freud developed a secular religion of uninhibited lust and sided with Darwin and Marx. Darwin rejected creation as the origin of life. Marx rejected Christianity as the origin of family and society. Freud’s idol became the uninhibited phallus. He projected his own incestuous fantasies onto all of us, onto his Christian milieu, and turned our living, creatively gifted soul into a sort of technical psychological apparatus. He also designated the unconscious as the demon ruling over consciousness and investigated alternative states of mind such as hypnosis and dreams. As a cocaine addict, he was certainly quite familiar with dwelling in an alternative state of mind. In doing so, Freud paved the way for an ideology of sexual disinhibition and moral decay. Freud lied about his supposed successes and falsified treatment results to his advantage, and built his fame through dishonest means. His nephew Edvard Barnay (a specialist in advertising) marketed him in the USA and made Freud famous. Freud charged extremely high fees, as he also had to pay servants to maintain his upper-class lifestyle. For years, he subjected his youngest daughter, Anna, to five- to six-day-long psychoanalysis sessions during her teenage years. Having been thoroughly analysed by her father, she became a child psychoanalyst. Later, Anna lived with a woman and her four children, two of whom took their own lives and one of whom died of alcohol poisoning. All four children struggled with drug problems throughout their lives. Freud’s grandson, Sir Clement Freud, later became publicly known as a paedophile. Can one therefore describe the Freud family as a dysfunctional family with indications of all manner of sexual perversions? Karl Jaspers accused Sigmund Freud of degrading intellectual life and elevating base instincts to an absolute. Freud reduced human beings to creatures of instinct and established an unprovable pseudo-religious dogma. In my own practice, I have found that psychoanalysis leads to a flawed mindset, a kind of navel-gazing and the reflex to blame one’s own suffering on one’s parents. This flawed mindset is regularly fostered and costs us a great deal of money, as in Germany, analysis is paid for by health insurance over many years, with several sessions a week.
Please consider leaving virtual flowers for this courageous woman at https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/276783855/ursula-hedwig_meta-haverbeck. Her memorial should be over flowing with bouquets.
Beautiful, Brave Ursula:
Thank you for your courage and perseverance.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw her on the BBC flagship public affairs show, Panorama.
Ursula Haverbeck charged right into the extravagant internal contradiction permeating the increasing rickety Holocaust narrative.
This lady touched my heart like no other. I haven’t words to say how much I miss you.I think it’s redundant to say how much you meant to so many of us………………but I know you already know that. God bless you Ursula.
“Put your light on a lampstand“ (Jesus) –
That is what Ursula Haverbeck did, and she became a shining example of uncompromising courage – Truly a warrior for the suppressed truth, always fighting “with compassion and great courage. She never compromised on speaking truth, staying true to her principles and facing her/our adversaries squarely and without fear.“ (quote from the article above, all too true)
(I’ve heard her once say) This German patriotic song was her favourite
Nichts kann uns rauben [Patriotic German song][+English translation] – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B33oFj6Jth8