Beautiful Ursula Haverbeck, your life work here on earth is now done. You can rejoin with those beautiful and strong German heroes who have gone before. Your spirit, your work, your compassion, your gigantic contribution in correcting the falsified history, have moved us inexorably closer toward ultimate victory! Your spirit will continue to live on in our hearts and minds. You upheld all that is beautiful, true and good. We will remember you.
Thank you!
At 96 years of age, Ursula has taken her last breath in the physical realm. She was an exceptional human being who was not only gifted with incredible intelligence and clarity, but also with compassion and great courage. She never compromised on speaking truth, staying true to her principles and facing her/our adversaries squarely and without fear.
What did Ursula Haverbeck do? She spent five years asking questions – she wrote to various levels of governments, to Jewish groups, to agencies, etc., asking them the simple question,
“Where did the alleged murder of 6 million Jews take place?”
None ever answered her question. Finally she went public with her conclusions. She concluded that nobody answered the question because there was no answer. There was no answer because there was no place. If there was no place where the crime happened, then the crime did not happen.
This is the video in which she addresses the German people, entitled “The Greatest Problem of our Time”, 20 minutes: https://www.bitchute.com/video/rd3LM7WusYkl
Here is an article telling more detail about Ursula’s life, including the trials and tribulations of being persecuted and jailed for having the courage to fight for historical truth: https://www.heritageanddestiny.com/ursula-haverbeck-1928-2024-warrior-for-truth/
Also please see previous articles about Ursula Haverbeck on this website, such as this one from October 2022: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-ordered-back-to-prison-and-her-rebuttal-to-this-order/ and this one from 7 December 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-update-on-the-verdict/ and this one from 3 December 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-faces-the-inquisition-again/ and from 5 November 2020: https://freespeechmonika.com/ursula-haverbeck-is-free/
It is noteworthy that the criminals in charge of the occupied state known as the Federal Republic of Germany were seeking to imprison Ursula right up to the moment of her death. They were trying to find a prison or even a prison hospital which could accommodate a 96-year old woman.
These beautiful words from Joe Fallisi in Italy:
“Ursula Haverbeck (Robert Faurisson International Prize 2019, first edition) has ascended to Valhalla to reunite with Ernst Zündel and so many other National Socialist heroes who were her comrades. A woman as beautiful on the outside as she was on the inside, intelligent, with integrity, adamantine, throughout her long life, so well spent, she fought for the honour of Germany and historical truth and justice. The miserable traitors in the pay and service of Shylock, who have occupied the whole of Europe since 1945, tried to defeat her courage, her probity. Impossible. The diamond remains as it is and shines forever.”
12 Responses
Something else about the patriotic milieu in the Federal Republic of Germany, which becomes apparent when you have dealings with it. Activists from this camp, who had organized rallies and influenced opinion, later disappeared again. Even though they were always much closer to you than the completely dependent people who were in tune with the spirit of the times, they still seemed wavering and not very independent. A few years later, the unreliability and contradictions that led to confusion became apparent. Some had become self-employed as journalists and teachers – they wrote articles for the neo-conservative milieu, distancing themselves from their previous nationalist work and offering opinion-forming courses on ideology and networking – they were looking for contacts. A completely unnecessary, opaque business model, because normal people will hardly spend time and money on such nonsense. Nevertheless, the converted nationalists seemed to be able to live off of it – they must have received money from some foundations and offices against right-wing extremism, anti-Semitism, racism, etc. It is almost certain that they had contacts there before – they were very probably already on assignment at that time, otherwise the Federal Republic of Germany would have such people persecuted and ensure that they do not receive any orders, even as tradesmen. Other reformed right-wingers took things even more colorfully – they worked as refugee helpers. In the Federal Republic of Germany, this milieu consists of three groups in particular: the first feels comfortable in its role as a national outsider, the second tries to make money from it, the third is commissioned by secret services. None of them are really interested in white people getting ahead – they don’t even use the word “white people” – you can’t get anywhere with them.
Ich stimme diesen Beobachtungen zu. Da wirft sicherlich Folgendes ein Schlaglicht auf die Vorgänge in unserem Lande. 2023 mußte die Bundesregierung zugeben, daß sie seit 2018 insgesamt fast 1,5 Millionen Euro an Journalisten gezahlt habe. Danach wurde die Regierung durch das Parlament nicht mehr zu Journalistenhonoraren befragt. So wissen wir nichts über wahrscheinlich fortlaufende Zahlungen. Besonders begünstigt wurden die Staatsmedien, die bei uns “öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk” genannt werden oder auch “Qualitätsmedien”. Allerdings wurde verheimlicht, was der Bundesnachrichtendienst BND (Geheimdienst) an weiteren Honoraren an Journalisten zahlte. Das Staatswohl stand höher als das Interesse der Bürger zu erfahren, wieviel gekaufte Berichterstattung es tatsächlich gibt. Das nennt sich hier selbst “die freie” Presse. Nicht eingeschlossen sind weitere Geldquellen. So hat Udo Ulfkotte in “Gekaufte Journalisten” 2014 preisgeben, wie viel er und andere von der CIA, der Atlantik-Brücke, der Trilateralen Kommission und dem Marshall Fund an Geld erhalten und wie sie beeinflußt werden. Ulfkottes Aussagen wurden sogleich öffentlich rechtlich angezweifelt und er wurde Rechtspopulist, Verschwörungstheoretiker und Islamkritiker genannt. Morddrohungen brachten ihn in ein geheimes Schutzprogramm. Mit nicht einmal 57 Jahren verstarb er plötzlich. Kartelle aus wenigen Großverlagen, auch der Sozialdemokratie, die Lizensierung von deutschen Pressehäusern wie die Verlage Springer (lange Jahre Medienmonopolist) und Bertelsmann (weltweit größter Medienkonzern) nach dem Krieg durch die Alliierten sind dabei nicht angesprochen. Auch nicht die enge Freundschaft und Vertrautheit, die Ex-Bundeskanzlerin Merkel mit Friede Springer und Liz Mohn von diesen Häusern pflegte. Ein höchst bedenkliches Netzwerk aus Macht und Einfluß. Der Geheimdienst (BND) überwacht, besticht und bespitzelt auch Journalisten (Schäfer-Bericht 2006), ebenso wie der Verfassungsschutz (Inlandsgeheimdienst). Beide nutzen Journalisten auch als Quellen. Wir sprechen auch nicht von der Massenüberwachung durch den Geheimdienst BND und Verfassungsschutz. Ist Journalismus hier noch frei oder schon rein staatliche Auftragsarbeit?
I think from now on I will put the “deepl” translation into these comments, Hilken, because they are very important, and most of my readers are english-speaking.
from Hilken:
I agree with these observations. The following certainly sheds light on what is happening in our country. In 2023, the federal government had to admit that it had paid a total of almost 1.5 million euros to journalists since 2018. After that, the government was no longer questioned by parliament about journalists’ fees. As a result, we know nothing about payments that are likely to be ongoing. The state media, which we refer to as ‘public service broadcasting’ or ‘quality media’, were particularly favoured. However, the Federal Intelligence Service (BND) kept secret the additional fees it paid to journalists. The public interest took precedence over the public’s right to know how much paid-for reporting actually exists. This is what is referred to here as “the free” press. Other sources of funding are not included. In his 2014 book *Gekaufte Journalisten* (Bought Journalists), Udo Ulfkotte revealed how much he and others receive in funding from the CIA, the Atlantik-Brücke, the Trilateral Commission and the Marshall Fund, and how they are influenced. Ulfkotte’s statements were immediately publicly questioned in legal terms, and he was labelled a right-wing populist, a conspiracy theorist and a critic of Islam. Death threats led to him being placed in a secret protection programme. He died suddenly, not even 57 years old. The cartels formed by a handful of major publishing houses, including those linked to the Social Democrats, and the licensing of German media houses such as the Springer publishing group (a media monopolist for many years) and Bertelsmann (the world’s largest media group) by the Allies after the war are not mentioned here. Nor is there any mention of the close friendship and intimacy that former Chancellor Merkel maintained with Friede Springer and Liz Mohn from these publishing houses. A highly worrying network of power and influence. The intelligence service (BND) monitors, bribes and spies on journalists (Schäfer Report 2006), as does the Office for the Protection of the Constitution (domestic intelligence service). Both also use journalists as sources. Nor do we speak of the mass surveillance carried out by the BND and the Office for the Protection of the Constitution. Is journalism here still free, or is it already purely state-commissioned work?
Translated with DeepL.com (free version)
Dear Monika, Mrs Haverbeck as well as you and Alfred have done something unusual – they have gone against the spirit of the times. Not many people manage that. We from the GDR see things more soberly. The activists who investigated the events surrounding the Holocaust and disseminated what they discovered did a lot. However, it is questionable whether the discovered contradictions are the “biggest problem of our time”. Even though the Holocaust primarily threatens the Germans and is used to enslave all whites, the bigger problem is slavery itself, because free people are not easily frightened. Ultimately, it doesn’t matter what keeps them unfree – if the Holocaust disappears, the magicians will pull something new out of their sleeves. If the whites want to regain control over themselves, true and liberal thinking must reach as many of them as possible. The mixing of such thinking with National Socialist thinking, as suggested by Fallisi, perhaps even the equating of freedom with an ideology – in this case National Socialism – is misleading, scares many people away and keeps them under the control of the Jews. Ursula and Werner Haverbeck are said to have trained young people in pedagogy, nature and NS-ideology in their Collegium Humanum. The fact that both were obviously close to National Socialism may have something to do with their positive experiences in the Third Reich, but critics were also discriminated against in the Third Reich and were denied work and training – this is exactly what happened to the National Socialists until 1933 and today many Germans in the Federal Republic of Germany are experiencing this. Education, work and life itself should be largely free of patronizing ideology – that is the realization of critically thinking GDR people. That is why we can hardly understand why Mrs. Haverbeck never got to this point. Her always good contacts with Horst Mahler – an old communist – and Henry Hafenmayer, who on his website disparaged less National Socialist-minded but solid Germans, were somewhat surprising. It should also be mentioned that this milieu is permeated by secret services and receives money.
Thank you for the interesting comment.
Just a brief response on a couple of points: I agree with Ursula Haverbeck about “The Holocaust” being the biggest problem of our time, or, articulated slightly differently, the lynchpin lie of our times. Reason being, to expose this lie is to expose the identity of the enemy of humanity, and that is organized Jewry. Second point is about National Socialism, if I could distill it to its simplest form, perhaps it could also be called Natural Law.
One more point, I will defend Henry Hafenmayer as a great man who did more than 99.99999% of our people for our people, had courage, integrity, intelligence and humility. He is no longer with us and so is unable to defend himself. We are much poorer by his absence, however we were so very enriched by his presence. His spirit and the spirit of Ursula Haverbeck will live on with us.
Thomas spricht von der Einschränkung der Freiheit. Ich denke, ich gebe eine wichtige Hintergrundinformation. Ich hoffe, das ist in Ordnung. Es geht um die Durchdringung unserer Gesellschaft mit dem Gedankengut der Psychoanalyse. Dieser Begriff wurde nicht von S. Freud, sondern von J. Breuer erfunden. Sigismund Schlomoh Freud entstammte der dritten Ehe seines Vaters, der sich vorher wiederholt hatte scheiden lassen. Seine um 20 Jahre jüngere Ehefrau vergötterte ihren goldigen Sigi. Er verliebte sich nach eigenem Bekenntnis in seine Mutter bei gleichzeitiger heftiger Eifersucht auf den Vater. Sigismund Freud lebte als Kind im Ghetto in Wien, entfremdet vom jüdischen Glauben wurde er Atheist. In der deutschen Version seines Namens, als Sigmund Freud, verlegte er den philosophischen Grundsatz, ich denke, also bin ich, in den Unterleib. Er erfand den Ödipus-Komplex. Und nun wird es pervers. Der unterstellt nämlich sexuelles Verlangen und einen Vereinigungswunsch des Sohnes zur eigenen Mutter. Gewissermaßen verdrehte S. Freud den Logos in den blinden Trieb und schuf den Primat von Sexus über Agape, von Dyonisus über Apoll. Sigmund Freud interessierte sich für das Irrationale, womit er abendländische Denktraditionen verneinte und subversiv unterbrach. Freud entwickelte eine sekulare Religion enthemmter Lust und stellte sich auf die Seite von Darwin und Marx. Darwin widersprach der Schöpfung als Ursache des Lebens. Marx widersprach dem Christentum als Ursache von Familie und Gesellschaft. Freuds Idol wurde der enthemmte Phallus. Seine eigenen inzestuösen Fantasien unterlegte er uns allen, seinem christlichen Umfeld und machte aus unserer lebendigen schöpferbegabten Seele eine Art technischen psychischen Apparat. Er bestimmte auch das Unbewußte zum Dämon über das Bewußtsein und untersuchte alternative Geisteszustände wie Hypnose und Traum. Als Kokainsüchtiger war ihm das sicherlich ganz vertraut, in einem alternativen Geisteszustand zu verweilen. Damit bereitete Freud eine Ideologie sexueller Enthemmung und eines Sittenverfalls vor. Freud log über seine vermeintlichen Erfolge und fälschte Behandlungsergebnisse zu seinen Gunsten und strickte mit unlauteren Mitteln an seinem Ruhm. Sein Neffe Edvard Barnay (Spezialist für Werbung) vermarktete ihn in den USA und machte Freud berühmt. Freud nahm extrem hohe Honorare, denn er mußte bei seinem großbürgerlichen Lebensstil auch Dienstboten bezahlen. Seine jüngste Tochter Anna quälte er als Jugendliche durch eine fünf- bis sechstägige Psychoanalyse über Jahre. Sie wurde – von ihrem Vater durchanalysiert – Kinderanalytikerin. Später lebte Anna mit einer Frau und ihren vier Kindern zusammen, von denen sich zwei das Leben nahmen und einer an einer Alkoholvergiftung starb. Alle vier Kinder hatten ihr Leben lang Drogenprobleme. Freuds Enkel Sir Clement Freud wurde später als Pädophiler öffentlich bekannt. Kann man also bei der Familie Freud von einer dysfunktionalen Familie sprechen mit Hinweisen auf allerlei sexuelle Perversionen? Karl Jaspers warf Sigmund Freud vor, das geistige Leben zu degradieren und die Niederungen zu verabsolutieren. Freud reduzierte den Menschen auf ein Triebwesen und errichtete ein unbeweisbares pseudoreligiöses Dogma. In meiner eigenen Praxis fand ich, daß die Psychoanalyse zu einer Fehlhaltung führt, einer Art Nabelschau und dem Reflex, alle eigenen Leiden den Eltern anzulasten. Diese Fehlhaltung wird regelmäßig erzeugt und kostet uns viel Geld, denn eine Analyse wird in Deutschland viele Jahre mit mehreren Sitzungen in der Woche von der Krankenversicherung bezahlt.
A very interesting comment, thank you Hilke! The true story about Sigmund Freud.
Please consider leaving virtual flowers for this courageous woman at https://www.findagrave.com/memorial/276783855/ursula-hedwig_meta-haverbeck. Her memorial should be over flowing with bouquets.
Beautiful, Brave Ursula:
Thank you for your courage and perseverance.
I’ll never forget the first time I saw her on the BBC flagship public affairs show, Panorama.
Ursula Haverbeck charged right into the extravagant internal contradiction permeating the increasing rickety Holocaust narrative.
This lady touched my heart like no other. I haven’t words to say how much I miss you.I think it’s redundant to say how much you meant to so many of us………………but I know you already know that. God bless you Ursula.
“Put your light on a lampstand“ (Jesus) –
That is what Ursula Haverbeck did, and she became a shining example of uncompromising courage – Truly a warrior for the suppressed truth, always fighting “with compassion and great courage. She never compromised on speaking truth, staying true to her principles and facing her/our adversaries squarely and without fear.“ (quote from the article above, all too true)
(I’ve heard her once say) This German patriotic song was her favourite
Nichts kann uns rauben [Patriotic German song][+English translation] – YouTube
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B33oFj6Jth8