Free Speech Monika

~ Exercising My Human Right to Speak Freely!

Please Share

Update on Alfred

Pawlow_20190429_0001

The Prosecutor’s appeal for MORE jail time for Alfred speaking in court and showing how high his dog Pavlov can jump has not yet reached its conclusion. There were two days of court this past week, 2019 November 12 and 14. Alfred had begun his Last Word, but was not finished speaking. The Last Word is the one remaining “right” that the accused has in the German court. The accused may speak as long as he likes, unless it is deemed irrelevant.

Highlights (or Lowlights):

(Very brief notes, taken by memory at the end of the day by a member of the public and passed on to Henry Hafenmayer, posted in German here.)

  • Alfred’s appeal – of the guilty verdict (38 month jail sentence plus court costs) for “speech crimes”, handed down 26 October 2018 culminating the Schaefer Sibling trial –  has been dismissed.
  • All paper and pens / pencils were confiscated from the public before entering the courtroom. This happened during our trial of 2018, but after a day or so this had been overruled. Not so this time. The prohibition on writing materials lasted both days. The public was NOT permitted to take any notes. 
  • Alfred started out facetiously stating that he would not open his mouth in court, because every word he spoke was turned upside down on him.
  • Alfred asked questions of the witnesses: a bureaucrat, one of the judges, and the prosecutor from the 2018 trial. The bureaucrat was asked if she had an indoctrinated fear causing shock with regards to the “Hitler salute”. Alfred asked the prosecutor if she was familiar with the game Musical Chairs. She has been in the prosecutor’s chair, now she is in the witness chair. Could she imagine one day being in the accused chair?
  • Addressing the court: Alfred asked what or whom specifically did he incite.

I am an engineer, and engineers need to name, define, work things very concretely otherwise you are thrown out onto the street.

  • The prosecutor asked Alfred if murderers called him when they want to do a murder. A gasp went through the gallery. Prosecutor continued, are your followers leftists or rightwing?
  • Prosecutor’s Plaedoyer: Alfred is a very dangerous anti-semite and jew-hater, and he should receive 5 years jail time (put together for the various “crimes”).

Alfred’s Last Word

  • The presiding judge interrupted and warned that Alfred was doing new “speech crime” by denying the holocaust, and that new charges could be laid. This could be the perpetual “merry-go-round” – do a speech crime, go to jail, go to court, new speech crime in court, more jail, appeal, new speech crime in court, more jail, appeal again and on and on and on.
  • Within the first two hours of Day 2, three different people took the prosecutor’s chair. Musical chairs. Ho hum just another day on the job.
  • After the judge warned Alfred he was getting off topic (bringing up other lies such as moon landing and the global warming scam) and that his Last Word could be withdrawn, Alfred spoke about a burning house. If you see that a house is on fire and you are aware of the presence of children inside, you have two choices. You could walk away and pretend not to notice, or you could rescue the children, with the full knowledge that your life could be at risk in so doing. His job is to rescue the children, just as it is his job to rescue the people from the dangers of the Lies.
  • In jail, many prisoners are having fun raising their right arm. Some boast how high their dogs can jump, others indicate how high the snow drifts are in front of their doors.
  • Alfred read some letters, including one from this author, and another from a jewish man who thanked Alfred for having protected him from being mobbed. This negates the prosecutor’s allegation that Alfred is a dangerous jew-hater. 

Court will resume 2019 November 21.

A reminder to the reader: Letters or cards are always appreciated. Alfred’s address is Stadelheimer Str 12, 81549 Munich, Germany. More information on writing to political prisoners in Germany in this article.

17 Responses

  1. We have to refine our arguments, learn how to speak indirectly in euphemisms. There’s a way to speak where the audience knows what you’re talking about but (((critics))) in the media and LEO have nothing to hold you to, like trying to nail jello to the wall.

    1. Their laws ARE like jello, that is the problem. The German Law Par. 130, the so-called “holocaust denial” law, does not mention the word holocaust, not even once.
      During my Last Word on 26 October 2018, I studiously avoided speaking about the holohoax, but still, there were several indications that they were drawing up new charges for things I said in that speech. That was why I turned from prisoner to fugitive, and left Germany rather quickly.
      Laws that protect lies HAVE to be like jello nailed to the wall, so that they can interpret and use them this way and that way to suit their agenda, clamping down on anybody speaking truth. The law never really states what you can or cannot say. You are right that we need to refine our arguments, however, trying to slither around their laws gets us nowhere, as they keep shifting the goal posts while they tighten their noose.
      But take heart! (((They))) are in panic mode as they know that the people are coming out of their long slumber. That is why they are clamping down so hard.

        1. I think you mean Stolz, yes? Sylvia Stolz.
          For those who do not speak German, stolz means proud in German. A very good name for Sylvia Stolz. And I am proud to be on the same side in this struggle together with her, the side of Truth and Light.

  2. All this madness; it sounds more like “Alice Through the Looking-Glass” or “Idiocracy” than a real court proceeding, yet, here we are … the Testimonial Merry-Go-Round. Stay strong, Monika; although The New Thunderbolt ceases publication next month, I shall of course continue to keep in touch with Alfred. All my best.

  3. Some “Germans” embrace Orwellian twists on the definitions of truth and freedom. Such ignorance is strength for their ZOG–actually a weakness in reliance upon big lies and repression of truth as their modus operandi.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

More Articles

Tea Time #2 with Brythonic

During 2018, Brythonic did many live-stream broadcasts with panels of people, about topics deemed politically incorrect. That generally means they touched upon the forbidden truth

Read More »